Kinetostatic analysis of assur dyads

Authors

  • Kostiantyn Khoroshev National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute", Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Kyryl Duchenko Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Serhii Kykot National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute", Kyiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1035-8711

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/1812-5409.2025/1.11

Keywords:

modular approach, kinetostatic analysis, class II plane mechanisms, Assur dyads

Abstract

The core of computer-aided design systems for design and calculation of plane mechanisms is the modular mathematical methods of studying the dynamics of the mechanisms. The most common approach is Multibody Dynamics, where a mechanism is divided into links that are assumed to be rigid bodies. The number of links is equal to the number of analysis modules. Another approach takes into consideration the structure of a mechanism, which can allow a reduction in the number of modules that need analysis. This approach necessitates the development of a plane mechanism classification and a comprehensive set of mathematical methods for analyzing the kinematics, kinetostatics, and dynamics of all possible structural elements. Of all the classification systems, Artobolevsky's one is the most aligned with the stated needs. Class II plane mechanisms according to the pointed classification have been fully covered by modular kinematic analysis algorithms, but kinetostatic analysis remains limited to a graph-analytical approach. The paper presents a unified analytical method of kinetostatic analysis of Assur dyads, which, along with class I mechanisms, constitute the structural elements of the class II mechanisms. The method is based on the vector equations of kinetostatics, solved using vector algebra tools. A full kinematic analysis must be performed beforehand. Active forces, inertial forces and reactions in kinematic pairs are represented as vectors, decomposed in the local bases rigidly attached to the dyad's links. The bases must be determined during the position analysis. The presented method is appropriate to use in combination with kinematic analysis, which also relies on vector algebra methods. It can be algorithmized and integrated into computer-aided design systems for class II plane mechanisms.

Pages of the article in the issue: 83 - 88

Language of the article: English

References

Abhery, K. (2022). An analytical parametric method for force analysis of planar mechanisms with sliding frictions. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 50(3), 667–691. https://doi.org/10.1177/03064190211035186

Artobolevski, I. (1977). Théorie Des Mécanismes Et Des Machines. Éditions Mir.

Brát, V., & Lederer, P. (1973). KIDYAN: Computer-aided kinematic and dynamic analysis of planar mechanisms. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 8(4), 457–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-114X(73)90020-7

Chace, M. A. (1963). Vector analysis of linkages. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, 85(3), 289–297. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3669867

Durango, S., Calle, G., & Ruiz, O. (2010). Analytical method for the kinetostatic analysis of the second-class RRR assur group allowing for friction in the kinematic pairs. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 32(3), 200–207. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-58782010000300002

Hansen, M. R. (1996). A general method for analysis of planar mechanisms using a modular approach. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 31(8), 1155–1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-114X(96)84606-4

Honchar, M. O. (2011). Theory of mechanisms and machines. Vydavnychyi dim Vinnychenko [in Ukrainian]. [Гончар, М. О. (2011). Теорія механізмів і машин. Видавничий дім Винниченка].

Jomartov, A., & Tuleshov, A. (2018). Vector method for kinetostatic analysis of planar linkages. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 40(2), 56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1022-y

Khoroshev, K., Duchenko, K., & Kykot, S. (2024). The direct vector approach to the position analysis of Assur dyads. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 195, 105608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2024.105608

Khoroshev, K. G., Duchenko, K. O., & Kykot, S. V. (2023). The vector algebra approach to the kinematic analysis of the structural groups of the 2nd class by Artobolevsky. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Physical and Mathematical Sciences, 2, 160–163. https://doi.org/10.17721/1812-5409.2023/2.28

Kinytskyi, Ya. T. (2002). Theory of mechanisms and machines. Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian]. [Кіницький, Я. Т. (2002). Теорія механізмів і машин. Наукова думка].

Nikravesh, P. E. (1988). Computer-Aided Analysis of Mechanical Systems. Prentice Hall.

Otter, M., Elmqvist, H., & Mattsson, S. E. (2003, November 3-4). The New Modelica MultiBody Library. In P. Fritzson (Ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Modelica Conference (pp. 311–330). Linköpings universitet. https://modelica.org/events/Conference2003/papers/h37_Otter_multibody.pdf

Roberson, R. E., & Schwertassek, R. (1988). Dynamics of Multibody Systems. Springer Verlag.

Simionescu, P. A. (2016, August 21–24). MEKIN2D: Suite for planar mechanism kinematics. Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, 5B-2016. Charlotte. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2016-59086

Uicker, J. J., Pennock, G. R., & Shigley, J. E. (2016). Theory of Machines and Mechanisms (5th ed.). Oxford University PressCovey.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-07

Issue

Section

Differential equations, mathematical physics and mechanics

How to Cite

Khoroshev, K., Duchenko, K., & Kykot, S. (2025). Kinetostatic analysis of assur dyads. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Physics and Mathematics, 80(1), 83-88. https://doi.org/10.17721/1812-5409.2025/1.11