Six-sector Lorenz model for critical infrastructure risk management

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/1812-5409.2025/1.13

Keywords:

Lorentz model, mathematical modeling, critical infrastructure, deterministic chaos, risk assessment

Abstract

The work is dedicated to the problem of developing mathematical methods for assessing the vulnerability of critical infrastructure (CI).

The main goal of the study is to create a mathematical model for forecasting crisis phenomena, ranking threat levels, and identifying weak links in CI that significantly affect the deformation of the security space. The model includes an economic block and a risk assessment block. The economic block is described by a six-sector Lorenz model with variable coefficients, which integrates similarly described economic sectors into a unified structure. Each sector is considered in terms of productivity, employment, and structural disruptions in sectors directly related to CI activities: energy, transport infrastructure, water supply networks and hydraulic structures, chemical industry, production, storage, and transportation of hazardous materials, as well as food and medical supplies, and information technology. The risk assessment block uses catastrophe theory methods to evaluate vulnerability of CI. Risk is assessed based on the proximity of the model parameters to their bifurcation values, upon reaching which the system transitions from a stationary state, characterized by acceptable vulnerability, to a state of increased vulnerability.

The main results of the work are related to the numerical study of the developed model. The conditions for the transition of interconnected economic sectors to a regime of deterministic chaos, due to changes in specific demand and supply for production system outputs and the number of jobs in them, as well as changes in the rate of elimination of structural disruptions, have been identified. It has been shown that there are parameter value ranges in the model where minor changes lead to significant transformations in the CI system and its security.

Further development of this work will focus on determining the dependence of the control parameters of the developed model on technological, environmental, economic, and social factors that characterize the functioning of CI.

Pages of the article in the issue: 97 - 103

Language of the article: English

References

Andronov, A., Witt, A., & Khaikin, S. (1959). Theory of oscillations. Physics and Mathematics Literature [In Russian].

Atoyev, K. (2005). The Challenges to Safety in the East Mediterranean: Mathematical Modeling and Risk Management of Marine Ecosystems. In E. Levner, I. Linkov, & J.-M. Proth (Eds.), Strategic Management of Marine Ecosystems, (рр. 179–197). Dordrecht: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3198-X_12

Atoyev, K., Ermolieva, T., & Knopov P. (2024). Mathematical Modeling of Interconnections Between Ecological, Food, and Economic Dimensions of Security. In, Nexus of Sustainability, Studies in Systems, Decision and Control (A. Zagorodny, V. Bogdanov, & A. Zaporozhts, Eds.), 559, 33–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66764-0_2

Atoyev, K., & Knopov P. (2022). Application of robust methods for estimation of distribution parameters with a prioriary constraints on parameters in economics and engineering. Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, 58(5), 713–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-022-00504-8

Atoyev, K., & Knopov, P. (2023). Mathematical modeling of climate change impact on relationships of economic sectors. Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, 59(4), 535–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-023-00589-9

Atoyev, K., Knopov, P., Pepeliaev, V., Kisała, P., Romaniuk, R., & Kalimoldayev M. (2017). The mathematical problems of complex systems investigation under uncertainties. In W. Wojcik, & J. Sikora (Eds.), Recent Advanced in Information Technology, 6, 135–171. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351243179-6

Atoyev, K., Tomin, A., & Aksionova, T. (2007). Global changes, new risks, and novel methods and tools of their assessment. Modeling and management of environmental security in Ukraine. In I. Linkov, R. J. Wenning, & G. A. Kiker (Eds.), Managing Critical Infrastructure Risks, Springer Netherlands (рр. 339–351). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6385-5_18

Ebeling, W., & Engel-Herbert, H. (1982). Extremal Principles and Catastrophe Theory for Stochastic Models of Nonlinear Irreversible Processes. Thermodynamics and Kinetics of Biological Processes, 197–215.

Ermoliev, Yu., & von Vinterfeldt, D. (2012). Systemic risk and security management. Managing Safety of Heterogeneous Systems, 19–49.

Ermoliev, Yu., Zagorodny, A., Bogdanov, V., Ermolieva, T., Havlik, P., Obersteiner, M., & Rovenskaya, E. (2020). Linking distributed sectorial optimization models under asymmetric information: towards robust food-water-environmental nexus. In Yu. Ermoliev, A. Zagorodny, V. Bogdanov, T. Ermolieva, & Yu. Kostyuchenko (Eds.), FEW Nexux for sustainable Development: Integrated Modeling & Robust Management (рр. 303–322).

Kaplan, J., & Yorke, J. (1979). Preturbulence: A regime observed in a fluid flow model of Lorenz. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 67(2), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01221359

Laszlo E. (1991). Age of Bifurcation: Understanding the Changing World. Gordon & Breach.

Lorenz, E. (1963). Deterministic nonperiodic flow. Journal of Atomic and Molecular Sciences, 20, 130–141.

Norkin, V., Gaivoronski, A., Zaslavsky, V., & Knopov P. (2018). Models of the Optimal Resource Allocation for the Critical Infrastructure Protection. Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, 54(5), 696–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-018-0071-7

Pepelyaev, V., Golodnikov A., & Golodnikova N. (2022). Reliability optimization in plant production. Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, 58, 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-022-00450-5

Pepelyaev, V., Golodnikov, A., & Golodnikova, N. (2023). Reliability optimization method alternative to bPOE. Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, 58, 593–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-022-00492-9

Pepelyaev V., Golodnikov A., & Golodnikova N. (2024). Method of Optimizing the Structure of Sowing Areas for the Adaptation of Crop Production to Climate Changes. Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, 60, 415–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-024-00682-7

Poston, T., & Stewart, J., (1978). Catastrophe Theory and Its Application. Pitman Publishing Ltd.

Renn, O. (2003). Typology of risks. Journal of risk research, 6 (4–6), 519–524.

Sergienko, I., Yanenko, V., & Atoev, K. (1997). A conceptual framework for managing the risk of ecological, technogenic, and sociogenic disasters. Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, 33(2), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02665894

Shulzhenko, S., Nechaieva, T., & Leshchenko, I. (2024). The Application of the Optimal Unit Commitment Problem for the Studies of the National Power Sector Development Under System Risks. Nexus of Sustainability, Studies in Systems, Decision and Control (A. Zagorodny, V. Bogdanov, & A. Zaporozhts (Eds.)), 559, 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66764-0_7

Wagenmakers, E., Molenaar, P., Grasman, R., Hartelman, P., & van der Maas, H. (2005). Transformation invariant stochastic catastrophe theory, Physica, D211, 263–276.

Wilkinson, A., Elani, S., & Eidinow, E. (2002). Risk world scenarios, Journal of Risk Research, 6(4–6), 297–334.

Zgurovsky, M. (2024). World Transformation After the COVID-19 Pandemic: The European Context. Nexus of Sustainability, Studies in Systems, Decision and Control (A. Zagorodny, V. Bogdanov, & A. Zaporozhts, Eds.) 559, 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66764-0_8

Zgurovsky, M., & Pankratova, N. (2007). System Control of Complex Objects. System Analysis: Theory and Applications. Data and Knowledge in a Changing World, 329–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48880-4_8

Downloads

Published

2025-07-07

Issue

Section

Computer Science and Informatics

How to Cite

Atoyev, K., & Knopov, P. (2025). Six-sector Lorenz model for critical infrastructure risk management. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Physical and Mathematical Sciences, 80(1), 97-103. https://doi.org/10.17721/1812-5409.2025/1.13